<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: tour review — pacific heights (sf architectural heritage)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sparkletack.com/2007/06/05/tour-review-pacific-heights-sf-architectural-heritage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sparkletack.com/2007/06/05/tour-review-pacific-heights-sf-architectural-heritage/</link>
	<description>San Francisco history stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 04:33:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SFluxe &#187; Homes Pacific Heights &#187; SF Architecture</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkletack.com/2007/06/05/tour-review-pacific-heights-sf-architectural-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-13552</link>
		<dc:creator>SFluxe &#187; Homes Pacific Heights &#187; SF Architecture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 08:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkletack.com/2007/06/07/tour-review-%e2%80%94-pacific-heights-sf-architectural-heritage/#comment-13552</guid>
		<description>[...] Miller, of SparkleTack.com, has been writing some of the most useful and well-researched articles online about San Francisco [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Miller, of SparkleTack.com, has been writing some of the most useful and well-researched articles online about San Francisco [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard - sparkletack</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkletack.com/2007/06/05/tour-review-pacific-heights-sf-architectural-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-5569</link>
		<dc:creator>richard - sparkletack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 17:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkletack.com/2007/06/07/tour-review-%e2%80%94-pacific-heights-sf-architectural-heritage/#comment-5569</guid>
		<description>I believe you are right about colors other than the whites, greys and browns mentioned by the guide originating much earlier than the 1960s. 

I just ran across a book called &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.booksense.com/product/info.jsp?affiliateId=RMiller1&amp;isbn=9780486417745&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&quot;Authentic Color Schemes for Victorian Houses&quot;&lt;/a&gt; published in 1883, which talks about the new vogue for painting Queen Annes in a much more interesting palette -- olive, russet, citrine, buff, plum, and sage, among other colors.

The guide must have meant that a revival of these started in the &#039;60s, as you suggest, or that a much brighter color scheme appeared at that point... or perhaps she was simply mistaken!

Not my area of expertise, but I&#039;d love for some smart reader/listener to shed some light on this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe you are right about colors other than the whites, greys and browns mentioned by the guide originating much earlier than the 1960s. </p>
<p>I just ran across a book called <a href="http://www.booksense.com/product/info.jsp?affiliateId=RMiller1&#038;isbn=9780486417745" target="_blank">&#8220;Authentic Color Schemes for Victorian Houses&#8221;</a> published in 1883, which talks about the new vogue for painting Queen Annes in a much more interesting palette &#8212; olive, russet, citrine, buff, plum, and sage, among other colors.</p>
<p>The guide must have meant that a revival of these started in the &#8217;60s, as you suggest, or that a much brighter color scheme appeared at that point&#8230; or perhaps she was simply mistaken!</p>
<p>Not my area of expertise, but I&#8217;d love for some smart reader/listener to shed some light on this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://www.sparkletack.com/2007/06/05/tour-review-pacific-heights-sf-architectural-heritage/comment-page-1/#comment-5522</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 12:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sparkletack.com/2007/06/07/tour-review-%e2%80%94-pacific-heights-sf-architectural-heritage/#comment-5522</guid>
		<description>I have my doubts about the &#039;painted ladies&#039; thing originating from the 1960&#039;s. The whole &#039;historical&#039; color phenom may have gained steam then, but the colors came from palettes that had their heyday at the turn of the century. If it was only the 1960&#039;s I have my doubts that my friends in Anderson, IN would have painted their Victorian houses there in the same colors as what&#039;s big in SF. You know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my doubts about the &#8216;painted ladies&#8217; thing originating from the 1960&#8217;s. The whole &#8216;historical&#8217; color phenom may have gained steam then, but the colors came from palettes that had their heyday at the turn of the century. If it was only the 1960&#8217;s I have my doubts that my friends in Anderson, IN would have painted their Victorian houses there in the same colors as what&#8217;s big in SF. You know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
